Black Audio Film Collective's distinctive approach to documentary filmmaking culminated in this film inspired by the story of 1960s black revolutionary leader Michael X. However, to call it a 'biopic', or anything resembling one, would be to miss the point. Who Needs A Heart is interested in the effect that the political spirit of the '60s, which threw up such a complex personality as Michael X, had on black/white relations on the one hand, and on the relationship between art and society on the other.
Narrative has been replaced by a collage of fragments. The soundtrack, which could fill a theatre by itself, has a hallucinatory relationship to the story. And the direction seems to have inhaled some of the experimental substances of the time it represents. Which isn't to say that Who Needs A Heart is a bad film. On the contrary, it is compelling, exhilarating and inexplicably moving, once the viewer realises that any attempt at a rational explanation is pointless.
The film reveals relatively little about Michael X, self-styled leader of the Black Muslims in London and president of the Racial Adjustment Action Society. It does, however, present a vivid description of the social scene through which such political movements flowed, and the emotional and psychological consequences for the young people caught up in it.
The connections between Michael X and the more famous revolutionary Malcolm X are investigated. As in Akomfrah's Handsworth Songs (1986) and Seven Songs For Malcolm X (1993), footage from Malcolm X's life punctuates the narrative. Interviewed by the Black Film Bulletin in 1993, Akomfrah revealed that his motivation was to reclaim the memories of Malcolm X for the black world instead of leaving him as just another American icon.
One effect common to all three films is a strange silence interlacing the narrative, as memory and history swim past each other. In Who Needs a Heart, this is taken quite literally: actors are silent for most of the film, acting out a story with elaborately stylised gestures, while dialogue is patchy and sometimes deliberately out of sync.
Ann Ogidi
|