Penthesilea, the first of six films made by Laura Mulvey and Peter Wollen, traverses thousands of years to look at the image of the Amazonian woman in
myth. It asks, among other questions, is the Amazonian woman a rare strong
female image or is she a figure derived from male phantasy? The film explores
the complexities of such questions, but does not seek any concrete answers.
Penthesilea is divided into five discrete sections. Peter Wollen describes
the nature of this structure when he talks to camera (operated by Laura Mulvey)
in the second. This is the one moment when intensions are addressed
relatively directly. Wollen, reading a text, explains that films are usually
edited to create an illusionary world in which viewers can immerse themselves.
He and Mulvey, in contrast, "wanted to call this imaginary world into question,"
and the camera here reflects this intention. As he reads his text, the camera
begins to draw away from him but, intriguingly, the volume of his speech remains
the same. (Camera and reader increasingly act independently too.) This simple
effect draws sharp attention to the fact that the camera does not assume the
ears and eyes of a real person that we identify with - if that were the case,
the volume would decrease. This is but one of several simple but imaginative
deconstructive devices employed by the directors to encourage the viewer to
question the 'illusionary world' of film and thus become more actively involved
in their discussion of myth and the Amazonian woman.
The film begins with a theatrical mime version of Penthesilea, originally
created by German writer and dramatist Heinrich von Kleist. Wollen explains that
this drew on the ancient story of the Amazonian Queen but that Kleist altered it
to fit in with his own personal attitudes towards women. Later, we see a woman
reading the words of a feminist over the images of a silent film about the
women's suffrage movement. These two sections present male and female versions
of the myth but also show how, paradoxically, new and old images exist in a form
of dialogue. We understand the past through the present but the present is
created out of what happened in the past. The filmmakers acknowledge that their
own exploration of the myth adds another layer to this process by filming, in
the last section, four monitors all showing previous sequences from the
film.
William Fowler
|