At the time his first play for television, 'A Night Out' (ITV, tx. 24/4/1960),
was broadcast, Harold Pinter was just beginning to attract attention. By the
time of The Lover (ITV, tx. 28/3/1963), Pinter was already well-established as
one of the most gifted and versatile writers of his generation, switching freely
between stage, television, radio and, shortly, film - his first screenplay, The
Servant (d. Joseph Losey) was released later in 1963.
The Lover is a typically claustrophobic work, in which a suburban
middle-class couple, played by Alan Badel and Pinter's then wife Vivien
Merchant, become trapped in the sexual role-playing games they use to spice up
their otherwise conventional marriage.
From its striking opening, in which two sets of silhouetted fingers tap upon
a drum and entwine themselves like a pair of mating tarantulas, the play creates
an atmosphere of eroticism unusual for television in 1963.
In the first scene, Sarah calmly tells her husband she is expecting a visit
from her lover; Richard responds with equal serenity. Only later do we learn
that the 'lover' is in fact her husband, and gain an insight into the erotic
games in which these two sophisticated and highly intelligent people indulge
their afternoons - fantasies of illicit encounters with strangers and sexual
threat.
These games contrast sharply with the sterile coldness of their 'real'
relationship: the superficial chatter of their evenings, the separate beds they
occupy at night. But when Richard begins to chip away at the wall separating
their two worlds, the fragile structure threatens to crumble. In the interest of
"frankness at all costs", he begins to question the arrangement, first with cool
detachment, then with mounting cruelty, careful all the while to preserve the
fiction. While Sarah talks of her lover in glowing terms - "his whole body
emanates love" - Richard dismisses his as merely "a whore", "a common or garden
slut".
In his role as the lover, 'Max', Richard continues his merciless assault,
accusing her of being 'too bony', and expressing concern about her husband.
Later, as Richard again, he even, absurdly, calls her an 'adulteress'. Finally,
in an ending reminiscent of the conclusion of John Osborne's Look Back in Anger
- the play which reinvigorated British drama in the 1950s - Richard and Sarah
revert to their game playing, in an apparent acknowledgement that there is no
escape from their mutual trap.
Mark Duguid
|