Since its birth, the cinema has enjoyed a special relationship with a fellow 
product and emblem of the modern age, the steam engine. The locomotive is not 
only the subject of the first ever projected film - the Lumière Brothers' 
L'Arrivée d'un train à la Ciotat, (Arrival of a Train, 1895) - but can take 
credit for what many consider cinema's first modern storyline in Edwin S. 
Porter's The Great Train Robbery (US, 1903). Today we might label the former a 
'documentary treatment' and the latter 'genre escapism': realism vs. romance. 
But it was the steam engine's ability to unite these tendencies, to be at once 
reassuringly familiar while suggesting the unknown, that made it a vehicle for 
cinema's special destiny, and gave it the enduring pull on the British cultural 
imagination.  
With the Bamforth Company's A Kiss in the Tunnel (1899) the formula was 
already in place. The film featured a stolen kiss aboard a carriage car, with 
the realistic sets and footage of a speeding train heightening the effects of a 
middle-class couple's moment of abandon. David Lean would later weave 86 
spellbinding minutes around this moment, imbuing his Brief Encounter (1945) 
between 'ordinary people' with the atmospheric potential of a railway station 
and expressing the promise of forbidden romance in swaths of steam and dark 
subway passages. Powell and Pressburger's 'I Know Where I'm Going!', made the same 
year, focuses less on the love story than the emotional journey of its 
protagonist. It begins for Wendy Hiller's Joan Webster on a gloriously idyllic 
journey by train to Scotland, and through Michael Powell's alchemy the carriage 
becomes a canvas for her dreams, hopes and fears.  
The original virtue of steam, however, was high speed. One of the first 
British sound films used the London-Edinburgh Flying Scotsman locomotive for 
this reason. A noir-ish tale of jealousy and revenge in which the actors 
(including a young Ray Milland) did their own stunt work, The Flying Scotsman 
(1929) evoked both the glamour and menace associated with the steam locomotive, 
so much so that the train's eminent designer Sir Nigel Gresley demanded an 
opening disclaimer stating that such practices did not and could not occur on 
the London North Eastern Railways (LNER). Half a decade later, in The 39 Steps 
(1935), Alfred Hitchcock shot footage of the same King's Cross-Edinburgh train, 
memorably barrelling across the magnificent Forth Bridge in Scotland.  
Following Hitchcock's lead (his own love-affair with trains began with the 
delirious Number Seventeen, 1932), British cinema of the 1930s used steam 
engines as much for their ability to confound appearance and reality as for 
kinetic thrills. The locomotive generated a façade - be it lovely or terrible - 
which masked a more disturbing reality in popular comedy-thrillers of the day. 
In Walter Forde's The Ghost Train (1931), a supernatural legend runs 
interference for a group of murderous international smugglers. At the climax, 
summary justice is enacted by the locomotive itself.  
More intriguing is Hitchcock's classic The Lady Vanishes (1938), which uses a 
sleepy Central European resort as the jumping off point for an espionage drama 
aboard a steam train. The title character is a kindly old lady who turns out to 
be a British spy, and the continental doctor with the admirable bedside manner 
connives to secure secrets for an enemy government. Embedded within the film is 
a pointed critique of appeasement, as the British passengers turn a deaf ear to 
the heroine, who is preyed on by increasingly aggressive German villains. 
Writers Launder and Gilliat had developed these themes earlier in Seven Sinners 
(d. Albert de Courville, 1936), a film notable not just for its overt political 
edge but for the unusually spectacular footage of a real train crash at its 
conclusion.  
Hitchcock's passengers also provide evidence of the way the environment 
aboard a train was thought to destabilise British class borders and restraints. 
Different types of 'Englishness' are represented in what might be called a 
'flies-in-a-jar' narrative. Their foreign counterparts - though sometimes 
jingoistic caricatures - then act as foils, through which various, often 
class-based problems are worked through. This motif is extended in a more 
cosmopolitan direction in Rome Express (1932), also from the pen of Sidney 
Gilliat. Its master-slave relationship between a shady businessman and his 
beleaguered butler is echoed by that between a street urchin-turned-Hollywood 
star and her hands-on manager.  
British filmmakers made free symbolic use of trains, from the wildly 
inventive dream sequence of 'I Know Where I'm Going!' (1945), in which human 
forms morph into engine into components, to Hitchcock's dark free associations 
of churning train wheels and train whistle howls with women's screams. With his 
'railroad trilogy' (Snow, 1963; Rail, 1967; Locomotion, 1975), documentarist 
Geoffrey Jones went one better, choreographing the rhythms of these components 
into breathtaking short films, which grant the properties of rail a life and 
poetry of their own. 
Jones's trilogy was begun after the announcement of the so-called Beeching 
Plan of 1962, which closed one-third of all British railways on economic 
grounds. Yet, being made for British Transport Films (BTF), they allow no 
defeatism. As the autonomous industrial film unit of a newly nationalised 
transport industry, BTF sought interesting ways to introduce new technologies to 
Rail employees and the British public at large. Not all BTF works were as 
dazzlingly original as Jones's, but they were consistently engaging and 
rewarding, and their craftsmanship - guided by head of production Edgar Anstey, 
a disciple of John Grierson - was impeccable. Even as the egalitarian promise of 
Labour wilted under the economic realities of the postwar 'austerity' years (and 
the Conservatives' ideological Transport Act of 1953), BTF continued to trumpet 
the progressive aspects of technology, imbuing their odes to modernity with a 
subtle respect for the past in films such as Elizabethan Express (1954), Train 
Time (1952) and A Future on Rail (1957). The torch was slowly passed from 
steam-powered trains to electric and diesel.  
BTF's forward-looking attitude stood in stark contrast to the diminishing 
returns of Ealing Studios or to mainstream culture in general, which as the 
1950s wore on began to show signs of hand-wringing at the closing of railway 
stations and the disappearance of steam. Steam engines increasingly became a 
symbol for all that was small, leisurely and community-based. An early example 
is the late Ealing comedy The Titfield Thunderbolt (1953), which pits the steam 
engine not against new rail technology, but against dastardly privatised buses. 
Threatened with the closure of their branch line, the villagers win the day 
thanks not to the speed of their engine, but its slowness.  
A decade later this trend was in full-force, with villainous stand-ins for 
the hated Dr Beeching himself, as in Runaway Railway (1965). The trend perhaps 
culminated in the ultimate steam-age nostalgia-trip, The Railway Children 
(1970). When in the 1970s, nostalgia became a true industry, steam found its way 
to the age of the Hollywood blockbuster in Agatha Christie's Murder on the 
Orient Express (1974). Sidney Lumet's admirable film shows an absorption of 
steam's cinematic past, with an international cast of characters to rival Rome 
Express and a mastery of Hitchcock's bag of tricks, most memorably in the 
opening when the steam engine roars to life, lights ablaze like a film projector 
in the dark. One can almost hear Wendy Hiller's voice ring out, 'I know where 
I'm going!' and smile at the thought that it's not necessarily 
so. 
Dominic Leppla 
 
 |